YOU KNOW WHAT! YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO TALK ABOUT A RELIGION YOU DONT FOLLOW(islam)
i havent said anything bad about christianity sense i commented on this
and trust me…THERE IS A LOT I CAN SAY
but im not like you im not going to make fun of a religion, that i don’t follow.
being a muslim I’m 100% SURE you no nothing about islam
“christianity is the only way to heaven”
wait don’t you believe that christ died for all are sins?
YEAH you do
so i guess everyone, good or bad, will b in heaven
Dear angelna0858,
I hold no brief for any religion, especially the nasty patriarchal brand known as Abrahamic monotheism. Though hideous honour killing of my sisters plainly occurs frequently in Islamic communities, this particular vid has hints of a transparent put-up job by Xtian propagandists. Surely at 0:34 s/he should say, “My blood is now haram”?
But, you couldn’t be more wrong. In a world that is libertarian, individualist, feminist, scientifically enlightened, and atheist (ie the modern world), we are all under a duty to ridicule religious beliefs. Why? Because they are superstitious and irrational, full of hatred of those who do not subscribe to the unfounded diktats of their particular creed.
Islam is the textbook example. The fact that you say religion should not be questioned shows that you are in the grip of a mind virus that is tenacious in preventing rational scrutiny. In effect you say that your religion cannot be criticised by those who do not understand it; and that if one understands Islam, one must agree that it is beyond criticism. The Catch-22 implication is that Islam is unfalsifiable, which is automatically unacceptable. Hence at least some parts of Islam must be false.
How about this part, for starters? The notorious Sura 9:029 in the handbook of your credo states as follows. I have inserted letters to make the logic more transparent. It is the standard Pickthal translation:
“Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as
(a) believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and (b) forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and (c) follow not the Religion of Truth,
until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.”
Thus a proposition from your creed, which you cannot question because it is supposedly the infallible word of some supreme masculine god-thing (I mean how ridiculous can you get?) commands you to:
- fight everyone who does not share your beliefs OR
- make non-believers pay a tax to demonstrate their subservient status OR
- convert everyone to your beliefs
In a nutshell, this is conquistadorial, clerical fascism.
What is your reply? Perhaps you don’t really take the Quran at face value? That I would like to hear you state 
.
In truth, what I invite you to do is study the psychology of the person writing such a command. The mentality of the quasi-mythical figure called Mohammed seems very paranoid-schizoid. BigMo constantly writes as if not recognising that some domain of his-her mind is inventing superhuman figures, into whose mouth the most vicious, self-aggrandising pronouncements are put.
Then ask yourself why you have adopted such a mindset? In other words, why do you live by a code that is morally disgusting to anyone who loves life and liberty, a code that demands the subjugation of everyone who disagrees with you, especially XX-SNC people like me?
We are at our most human and communicate at the highest level when we are lovers. Yet, as I walk around Stratford and Waltham Forest, I rarely see the couples that devoutly parade their Muslim faith also showing each other gentle affection by kissing, holding hands and laughing with each other. If the practice of a doctrine prevents people from engaging in intuitive and life-enhancing intimacy, then that doctrine is antagonistic and anti-human.
Contrasts are useful. Try watching and understanding a grown-up person who sings of love and melanchology and the sophisticated truths of the human heart. A French XX-SNC person, whose music I adore.
(i) Ma plus Belle Histoire d’Amour c’est Vous
watch?v=fMIrSnOd38Y
(ii) Si la photo est bonne
watch?v=hF74PFQqZnY
Regards, andrea
You bear some striking similarities to Ayn Rand (the mother of the ‘objectivist’ and ‘libertarian’ movement in the US). Her obsession with sex, free market policies and the ‘lift yourself up by your bootstraps’ nonsense is something that gets all Randian cult members all hot and bothered.
Here’s what Zizek had to say about Rand:
“….Rand, who wrote the two absolute best-sellers of our century, The Fountainhead (1943) and Atlas Shrugged (1957), was (deservedly) ignored and ridiculed as a philosopher: her fascination with male figures displaying absolute, unswayable determination of their Will, seems to offer the best imaginable confirmation of Sylvia Plath’s famous line, “…every woman adores a Fascist”…….Rand fits into the line of over-conformist authors who undermine the ruling ideological edifice by their very excessive identification with it.”
I guess that just about sums you up. Over-conformism and conservatism with shades of anarchism (Rothbard, etc.).