Yes Aisha (RA) was nine. Yes she did consent and was supported by her parents. She was actually engaged to another man prior to the Prophet (SWS) seeing her in a dream sent by Allah (SWT) Her father Abu Bakr (RA) was Muhammad’s (SWS) closest companion. She was the main transmitter of hadith and one of the most highly respected of the early ulema. Allah’s (SWT) supreme plan defies the puny understanding of the human mind which is why mankind must submit to the perfect will of the Creator to find peace. The Quran relates another story of Khidr and Musa (AS) where Khidr slays an innocent boy who has done nothing wrong. This throws Musa (AS) into confusion for he does not see the justice in this. A reason the child was slain was because Allah (SWT) knew that he would be rebellious and cause his parents trouble so they blessed the parents with a good son in the short future. Ibrahim (AS) was commanded by Allah (SWT) to slay his only son to test his obedience. Some of the things that Allah (SWT) will command will irk your sensibilities and morality, but they are a test of whether you love Allah (SWT) above your own limited perception of the whole picture. You must love Allah above good and evil. To your question as to whether you can be raped, I am no scholar and cannot pass some judgement like that. However, in my limited understanding I would say being that you are a dirty kuffar and being that we are currently at war, you and all others like you are the rightful property of the Muslims and we are not to neglect your sexual needs and can satisy ours with you whenever we wish. That being said may the true light of Islam shine forth to your soul and may you be convinced of the irrisitable Love and Power of Allah (SWT). May you be guided on the right path away from all the Godlessness of this dunya. As Muhammad SWS) said: This world is a prison for the believers, but a paradise for the unbelievers.

please keep islam out of your mouth, you zionist whore. if you knew the truth about who’s lahd it is, you wouldn’t believe it.

“You cannot stop flaming people’s beliefs if that take a stance that tarnishes another’s beliefs such as promoting anti-theism. I’m an atheist, I don’t believe in a god, but I don’t go around telling other to believe in the same stuff I believe.

I rather have people having their own personal, individual religion. That way they are free from society and can make a conscious and philosophical journey in knowing what are truly their own beliefs.

The most corrupt thing about religion is society.

Anti-theism is a form of prejudice. Saying “Damn to all believers of god,” isn’t much different than when you go to one of those ceremony shit things at a church and they say “damn to all non-believers.”

You cannot very well defend your own beliefs and distinguish them from another if you exercise them in a means that offends others.

Better to re-examine your beliefs and to try to live in harmony with others regardless of what you believe. And fyi, I don’t believe in god.”

And then it changes from:

“Sign boarding is not freedom of speech. It is freedom of press or expression.

Having a sign that says “Imagine no Religion” can be interpreted the same as it saying “Imagine no Atheism.”

As an atheist I would find that rather distasteful. And the American Constitution does not state that the freedom of speech is a paramount right. The constitutional founders didn’t intend it to be designed that way and there are no laws that really enforce that amendment.”

Doesn’t anyone notice another person speaking. Yes I wrote the top portion on a comment on Youtube. Are people these days so bored or so hopeless of doing something, anything that they have to borrow my identity for their own self-arguments.

You know this is wrong andreaandrewmilne, for stealing my identity and bringing it up on here. This isn’t fair… GAH! I don’t have the words to describe just how frustrated I am!

I love the smell of antisemitism in the morning, don’t you? See you at the gas chambers, andrea. The fact that you can speak of ‘the’ Islamic ideology, in the singular, is revealing. andrea’s knowledge of Islam is Islam for andrea. There is one ‘Islamic ideology’ for andrea, and therefore only one Muslim. Do you ever stop and listen to yourself?

Here’s what Zizek had to say about Rand:

“….Rand, who wrote the two absolute best-sellers of our century, The Fountainhead (1943) and Atlas Shrugged (1957), was (deservedly) ignored and ridiculed as a philosopher: her fascination with male figures displaying absolute, unswayable determination of their Will, seems to offer the best imaginable confirmation of Sylvia Plath’s famous line, “…every woman adores a Fascist”…….Rand fits into the line of over-conformist authors who undermine the ruling ideological edifice by their very excessive identification with it.”

I guess that just about sums you up. Over-conformism and conservatism with shades of anarchism (Rothbard, etc.).

You say that you don’t like men, but say that you like science. Think how vastly inferior the hard sciences would be if it were not for the able male minds which have dominated them since the moment of their creation by able male minds. Women are vastly inferior to males at the top end of the ability range, L. Summers and S. Pinker have it exactly right. Progress in the sciences and mathematics would slow to a snail’s pace if left to the very limited number of able females.

Do you hate men because you feel inferior to them? What are your thoughts?